glp1medication.guide

brands

Ozempic vs Mounjaro: The Diabetes Head-to-Head

What this page establishes

  • SURPASS-2 randomised 1,879 adults with type 2 diabetes to tirzepatide 5, 10 or 15 mg or semaglutide 1 mg weekly for 40 weeks. HbA1c fell 2.01, 2.24 and 2.30 percentage points versus 1.86 for semaglutide.
  • Ozempic is licensed for glycaemic control, cardiovascular risk reduction in type 2 diabetes with established cardiovascular disease, and kidney outcomes in type 2 diabetes with chronic kidney disease.
  • Mounjaro is licensed for glycaemic control in adults and paediatric patients aged 10 and over with type 2 diabetes, with no cardiovascular or renal outcome indication on its label.

Quick answers

  • Which lowers blood sugar more?

    In SURPASS-2, tirzepatide at all three doses lowered HbA1c more than semaglutide 1 mg over 40 weeks.

    Read the full answer
    The comparison was against 1 mg, and Ozempic is now licensed up to 2 mg, so the trial does not settle the question at current maximum doses.

  • Which is better for the heart?

    Ozempic carries a licensed cardiovascular risk reduction indication for type 2 diabetes with established cardiovascular disease.

    Read the full answer
    Mounjaro does not carry one. That is a statement about what has been demonstrated to regulators, not a claim that tirzepatide is bad for the heart.

  • Can either be prescribed for weight loss?

    Not on these labels. The weight-licensed versions of the same two molecules are Wegovy and Zepbound.

    Read the full answer

Ozempic and Mounjaro are the two diabetes brands people most often weigh against each other, and SURPASS-2 compared them directly. Over 40 weeks, tirzepatide lowered HbA1c more than semaglutide 1 mg at every dose tested.

The trial

SURPASS-2 randomised 1,879 adults with type 2 diabetes on metformin to tirzepatide 5, 10 or 15 mg or semaglutide 1 mg, all once weekly, for 40 weeks. Mean baseline HbA1c was 8.28% and mean baseline weight 93.7 kg.

HbA1c fell 2.01, 2.24 and 2.30 percentage points on tirzepatide 5, 10 and 15 mg against 1.86 points on semaglutide. Tirzepatide was non-inferior and then superior on the primary endpoint, and produced greater weight reduction as well.

One design detail matters when reading this: the comparator was semaglutide 1 mg, which was the maximum Ozempic dose at the time. Ozempic now goes to 2 mg. The trial did not test that.

The caveat that is usually dropped SURPASS-2 compared tirzepatide against semaglutide 1 mg. Ozempic’s licensed maximum is now 2 mg. Anyone quoting this trial as "Mounjaro beats Ozempic" is quoting a comparison against a dose that is no longer the ceiling.

What the labels say, which is not the same question

Ozempic is licensed for glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes, for cardiovascular risk reduction in type 2 diabetes with established cardiovascular disease, and for kidney outcomes in type 2 diabetes with chronic kidney disease.

Mounjaro is licensed for glycaemic control in adults and children aged 10 and over with type 2 diabetes. It carries no cardiovascular or renal outcome indication.

So on HbA1c the trial favours tirzepatide, and on licensed outcome claims Ozempic has two that Mounjaro does not. Those are different things and a comparison that reports only the first is incomplete.

The evidence, one row per claim

ClaimTierSource
SURPASS-2 randomised 1,879 adults with type 2 diabetes to tirzepatide 5, 10 or 15 mg or semaglutide 1 mg weekly for 40 weeks. HbA1c fell 2.01, 2.24 and 2.30 percentage points versus 1.86 for semaglutide.establishedSURPASS-2, New England Journal of Medicine
Ozempic is licensed for glycaemic control, cardiovascular risk reduction in type 2 diabetes with established cardiovascular disease, and kidney outcomes in type 2 diabetes with chronic kidney disease.establishedFDA Structured Product Label, NDA209637 (via openFDA)
Mounjaro is licensed for glycaemic control in adults and paediatric patients aged 10 and over with type 2 diabetes, with no cardiovascular or renal outcome indication on its label.establishedFDA Structured Product Label, NDA215866 (via openFDA)

Sources

  1. SURPASS-2, New England Journal of Medicine
  2. FDA Structured Product Label, NDA209637 (via openFDA)
  3. FDA Structured Product Label, NDA215866 (via openFDA)

Where this comes from

Every number on this page traces to a named source. There are 3 sourced claims below the fold, each with the document it came from.

Sources consulted: SURPASS-2, FDA Structured Product Label.

Not clinically reviewed. This page was researched and written against primary regulatory and trial sources, and no clinician has checked it.

Sources last read 2026-08-23.

Keep reading

Educational content, reviewed 2026-08-23. Not medical advice, not a prescription, and not a substitute for a clinician who knows your history. Doses named here are label schedules or doses used in named trials, never a recommendation to you.

Evidence updates

When a number here changes, you will know