What this page establishes
- TRIUMPH-1 enrolled 2,339 adults with obesity or overweight plus at least one weight-related comorbidity, without diabetes, over 80 weeks, randomised and placebo-controlled.
- At 12 mg, mean weight loss was 28.3% (70.3 lb) at 80 weeks, with 45.3% of participants losing >=30% of body weight.
- Dose-response in the programme: 17.6% (4 mg), 23.7% (9 mg), 25.0% (12 mg) vs 3.9% placebo on one reported estimand.
- Participants with baseline BMI >=35 who continued into a study extension reached up to 30.3% (85.0 lb) mean weight loss at 104 weeks.
Quick answers
Is retatrutide available by prescription?
No. It is investigational and in phase 3, with no marketing authorisation from any major regulator.
Read the full answer
That means no prescription route, no compounding route and no off-label route. Trial enrolment is the only legitimate way to receive it.How much weight did people lose on retatrutide?
In TRIUMPH-1, mean loss at 80 weeks was 28.3% on 12 mg, and 45.3% of that group lost at least 30% of their body weight.
Read the full answer
An extension in participants with baseline BMI of 35 or above reached 30.3% at 104 weeks. TRIUMPH-2 and TRIUMPH-3 reported up to 22.6% in their own populations.Why do different sources quote different retatrutide numbers?
Different trials, doses, durations and statistical estimands. TRIUMPH-1 at 12 mg alone has two defensible figures, 25.0% and 28.3%, because they are calculated on different estimands.
Read the full answer
Any percentage without a trial name, dose and week attached cannot be checked.
Retatrutide has produced the largest weight-loss results ever published for a drug: 28.3% mean loss at 80 weeks on 12 mg in TRIUMPH-1, and 30.3% at 104 weeks in a higher-BMI extension. It also has no FDA-approved application as of 23 August 2026, which means there is no US prescription route to it outside a clinical trial. Everything sold online under the name retatrutide comes from unregulated synthesis and is not the drug those trials tested. Both of those facts are true at once, and the forums that push the first one tend to skip the second.
What retatrutide is
Retatrutide is a once-weekly injectable peptide that activates three receptors: GIP, GLP-1 and glucagon. Semaglutide hits one of those. Tirzepatide hits two. The glucagon receptor is the addition that makes retatrutide structurally different from everything already approved, and it is the reason the efficacy numbers stepped up rather than crept up.
Glucagon receptor agonism is associated with increased energy expenditure, which is a different lever from the appetite and gastric-emptying effects that drive GLP-1 weight loss. Whether that mechanism explains the trial results is a question the full publications should answer, not something the topline numbers establish on their own.
Retatrutide is also sold and discussed as reta, reta peptide, triple-G, GGG and "GLP-3". The last of those is not a real receptor or drug and is explained on our GLP-3 page. Its Eli Lilly development code is LY3437943, which is the term to use when searching for primary sources.
TRIUMPH-1: the headline result
TRIUMPH-1 randomised 2,339 adults with obesity, or overweight plus at least one weight-related comorbidity, without diabetes. It ran 80 weeks, placebo-controlled.
At 12 mg, mean weight loss was 28.3%, reported as 70.3 lb. 45.3% of participants in that arm lost 30% or more of their body weight. Placebo lost 3.9% on the estimand where the dose-response was reported.
- 4 mg: 17.6% mean loss
- 9 mg: 23.7% mean loss
- 12 mg: 25.0% on that estimand, 28.3% on the estimand carrying the 70.3 lb figure
- Placebo: 3.9%
The 104-week extension
Participants with a baseline BMI of 35 or above who continued into a study extension reached up to 30.3% mean weight loss at 104 weeks, reported as 85.0 lb. That is the largest figure attached to retatrutide anywhere and it is the one most often quoted without its conditions, which are a specific subgroup, a longer duration and continued treatment.
The rest of the TRIUMPH programme
TRIUMPH-2 and TRIUMPH-3 reported up to 22.6% weight reduction in their own populations. The headline number for retatrutide therefore varies by roughly six percentage points depending on which trial you cite, which is not inconsistency but a reminder that populations and endpoints differ across a programme.
Lilly's phase 3 reporting also described substantial relief from osteoarthritis pain alongside weight loss. That finding is early and comes from company reporting rather than an independent publication, so treat it as emerging rather than settled.
Regulatory status: not approved anywhere
Retatrutide is in phase 3. It has no FDA-approved application as of 23 August 2026. There is no compounding route, no off-label prescription route and no early-access route that a member of the public can use. The only legitimate way to receive retatrutide is enrolment in a trial that is recruiting.
Long-term safety has not been established outside the trial programme. Class-typical gastrointestinal effects are expected, and the glucagon component raises questions about heart rate and hepatic parameters that the full publications need to answer.
Why research-use-only retatrutide is not the trial drug
Retatrutide is one of the most heavily sold compounds in the grey market, precisely because the trial data are extraordinary and the drug is unobtainable. Products sold under that name are synthesised outside the regulated supply chain and shipped with a research-use-only label.
That label is a legal position taken by the seller. It is not a quality assurance. There is no independent verification of identity, no assay confirming concentration, no sterility testing and no stability data for the vial in front of you. The peptide impurity and immunogenicity concerns FDA has cited for unregulated peptide supply apply directly here.
The practical consequence is that a dose number from TRIUMPH-1 cannot be carried over to a grey-market vial, because the amount of drug actually present is unknown. The trial results describe a specific molecule at a specific purity delivered under supervision. None of those conditions hold outside the trial.
The evidence, one row per claim
| Claim | Tier | Source |
|---|---|---|
| TRIUMPH-1 enrolled 2,339 adults with obesity or overweight plus at least one weight-related comorbidity, without diabetes, over 80 weeks, randomised and placebo-controlled. | established | AJMC |
| At 12 mg, mean weight loss was 28.3% (70.3 lb) at 80 weeks, with 45.3% of participants losing >=30% of body weight. | established | AJMC / Lilly |
| Dose-response in the programme: 17.6% (4 mg), 23.7% (9 mg), 25.0% (12 mg) vs 3.9% placebo on one reported estimand. | established | The Pharmaceutical Journal |
| Participants with baseline BMI >=35 who continued into a study extension reached up to 30.3% (85.0 lb) mean weight loss at 104 weeks. | established | Eli Lilly press release |
| TRIUMPH-2 and TRIUMPH-3 reported up to 22.6% weight reduction, i.e. the headline number varies by trial and population and must be attributed precisely. | established | The Cardiology Advisor |
| Lilly's phase 3 programme also reported substantial osteoarthritis pain relief alongside weight loss. | emerging | Barchart / Lilly release |
| Retatrutide has no FDA-approved application as of August 2026. | established | openFDA Drugs@FDA query returning no approved US application for retatrutide — the query deliberately returns no results, and that absence is the evidence |
Questions people ask
Is retatrutide stronger than tirzepatide?
Its trial numbers are larger, but the two have not been compared head-to-head in a published randomised trial. SURMOUNT-1 and TRIUMPH-1 ran for different durations in different populations with different placebo responses, so the gap between 22.5% and 28.3% is indirect evidence rather than a measured difference.
What are the side effects?
Gastrointestinal effects consistent with the incretin class were reported in the trials. Beyond that, long-term safety is not established, because the compound has not been through the post-approval surveillance that approved drugs accumulate. The glucagon-receptor component raises additional questions that the full publications should address.
Sources
- AJMC
- The Pharmaceutical Journal
- Eli Lilly press release
- The Cardiology Advisor
- Barchart / Lilly release
- openFDA Drugs@FDA query returning no approved US application for retatrutide — the query deliberately returns no results, and that absence is the evidence (returns no results — that is the evidence)
Keep reading
- GLP-3 Peptide: There Is No Such Drug, and What the Search Really MeansA term invented by the market, answered by nobody who is not selling something.
- Peptides for Weight Loss: A Tiered Guide to What Is Approved, Pipeline, and Grey MarketThe triage page. Place any compound name into one of three tiers in seconds, with the best trial number and th
- GLP-1 and Doping: WADA Status of Semaglutide and TirzepatideThe question has two answers and most coverage gives only the first. An approved GLP-1 is not banned. An unapp
- The Next-Generation Obesity Drug Pipeline: Who Is WhereA maintained status board, not an essay. One row per candidate, with a visible review date.
- Research-Chemical Peptides: 5-Amino-1MQ and the Grey MarketThe consumer-protection page, built around the cleanest example of a compound with everything except human evi
- Cagrilintide and CagriSema: The Amylin Route to Weight LossA genuinely different mechanism, and a case study in how obesity trial results get framed as wins or misses.
